Supreme Court
100 N 9th St,
Richmond, VA, 23219
Phone: 804-786-6455
Related Cases
- 030965 Virginia Tech. v. Interactive Return Service 04/23/2004 The circuit court did not err in admitting evidence of consequential damages in a breach of contract action concerning assignment of inte
- 010480 Commonwealth v. Shaffer 03/01/2002 A person whose operator's license was revoked under then-existing habitual offender provisions in 1997, and who waited until late in 1999 to file a petition f
- 961774 Harris v. Harman 04/18/1997 The trial court properly submitted to a jury the issue whether actions of a "tailgating" driver were a proximate cause of an accident and did not err in refusing to
- 000417 Motley II v. Virginia State Bar 09/15/2000 An order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board is reviewed in an appeal of right. Since there is no error found, the order imposing upon the at
- 000474 Commercial Underwriters Ins. v. Hunt & Calderone 01/12/2001 In a declaratory judgment action regarding coverage under a professional liability insurance policy, the insured had the burden to sh
- 980061 Commonwealth v. Price 11/06/1998 Because the Court of Appeals correctly found that the defendant was held continuously in custody in excess of five months from a finding of probable cause until
- 951365 Gerald M. Moore and Son Inc. v. Drewry 03/01/1996 In the absence of privity, a person cannot be held liable for economic loss damages caused by his negligent performance of a contract and a que
- 980913 Parish v. Spaulding 02/26/1999 In this appeal of an order adjudicating issues of child custody, visitation, and support, the trial court employed proper procedures in determining the merits of
- 110323 Askew v. Collins 03/02/2012 In a defamation action in which the jury found defendant liable for one particular statement, and returned a verdict for compensatory and punitive damages, the trial
- 020774 Commonwealth v. Bruhn 11/01/2002 The Court of Appeals of Virginia correctly determined that under Code ยง 18.2-111, as amended, proof of embezzlement will not sustain a conviction under an indic