Supreme Court
100 N 9th St,
Richmond, VA, 23219
Phone: 804-786-6455
Related Cases
- 002900 O'Connell v. Bean 01/11/2002 In a legal malpractice case, due to the failure of plaintiff's counsel to include the out-of-state defendant's address in an affidavit submitted pursuant to the ser
- 941686 Va. Builders' Supply v. Brooks & Co. 09/15/1995 In this creditors' rights controversy, the trial court erred in holding that a garnishee, after being served with the summons in garnishment, may
- 000590 HomeSide Lending v. Unit Owners Assoc. 01/12/2001 In a case commenced by a condominium owners' association for unpaid assessments, Code § 55-79.84(A) establishes the applicable priority of lien
- 062111 Miller v. Highland County 09/14/2007 In appeals challenging a county board of supervisors' approval of a conditional land use permit, it is held that the board is a required party defendant and
- 950270 American Assoc. of Retired Persons v. Bell Atlanti 11/03/1995 The evidence of record before the State Corporation Commission supported each of the findings required under Code A
- 970880 Williams v. Harrison 02/27/1998 In a wrongful death action following an automobile accident, the trial court's ruling allowing submission of the defense of contributory negligence and its refus
- 010579 Remington v. Commonwealth 09/14/2001 Upon review of a sentence of death, no reversible error is found. There is no reason to commute the death sentence, and the judgment of the circuit court is
- 000836 Welding Inc. v. Bland County Service Auth. 03/02/2001 Since the tolling provision of Code § 8.01-229(E)(1) is applicable to this action, the judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendant
- 961324 Moore & Moore Gen. Contr. v. Basepoint Inc. 04/18/1997 In this dispute concerning a buyer's acceptance of nonconforming goods, the trial court correctly concluded that the Uniform Commercial Co
- 970867 Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Darcy 02/27/1998 Code § 65.2-500 measures compensation for total disability and in affirming a ruling of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that the claimant