Find Laws
Find Lawyers
Free Legal Forms
USA State Laws
COURT
Supreme Court
100 N 9th St,
Richmond, VA, 23219
Phone: 804-786-6455
Related Cases
052079 Lynch v. Commonwealth 06/08/2006 The Court of Appeals correctly affirmed a defendant's conviction on murder, armed robbery, burglary and firearms charges, rejecting challenges focusing on the a
051613 Saks Fifth Avenue v. James, Ltd. 06/08/2006 In a suit for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of Code §§ 18.2-499 and -500 prohibiting conspiracy to injure another’s business, involving the
941648 Tarmac Mid-Atlantic Inc. v. Smiley Block Co. 06/09/1995 The trial court abused its discretion in excluding expert testimony on the basis that it lacked an adequate foundation and granted a moti
030965 Virginia Tech. v. Interactive Return Service 04/23/2004 The circuit court did not err in admitting evidence of consequential damages in a breach of contract action concerning assignment of inte
970053 Virginia High School League v. J.J. Kelly H.S. 10/31/1997 A nonstock corporation organized to foster athletic competitions between Virginia high schools violated its own bylaws in reclassifying
950757 Davis v. Mullins 01/12/1996 After many years in the courts, a bitterly contested boundary dispute was erroneously resolved since the trial court decisions over more than ten years were based on
000337 Smith v. Richmond Newspapers Inc. 01/12/2001 The circuit court properly concluded that audio tape recordings of a felony criminal trial were records of the circuit court open to inspection purs
020188 Shepherd v. Davis 01/10/2003 In consolidated suits for specific performance of agreements concerning two adjacent parcels of land, there was no error in the chancellor's decrees holding that a
011306 Willis v. Mullett 04/09/2002 The statute that reduces the tolling period provided for minors' tort claims for medical malpractice (Code § 8.01-243.1) is constitutional under federal and Virgini
992179 Majorana v. Crown Central Petroleum 11/03/2000 A plaintiff's claims of respondeat superior liability for an employee's assault were erroneously dismissed as a matter of law; judgment upon a jur
Comments
Tips